The students had smelled this track, when asking for “Profs with experience of the enterprise. Curious, the rare imprudent philosophers,  (including Simone Weil, Twiggy not Fatty), were ludicrous while the enterprise has a terrible need for true philosophy.

3.1 Aside on my “gold rules”.
        The most popular? “The solution is no more in the place of the problem…” with an appreciated cherry: “The managers would have found it… The most unexpected? my rule to detect a true philosopher, (which led me right to Wittgenstein, the difficult philosopher for an engraved brain):
3.2 Aside for the readers that interest me…
       The “Kantian” adjective summarizes the intellectual and moral requirement. The philosophers whom I mentioned up to now are all “Kantian”, (nothing to see with “ayto-appointed-Kantian ministrosopher stuffed with  “Fichte-me-that”). The inKANTournable is invaluable for me. To play a good joke to the “philosophers”, let's make them elect the leader that will kick them all. Considering that scientists and philosophers use the same brain, I launch a GEMINI investigation :  all the “philosophers” give points to Kant, (who ignore them  and they finish in the box “histoirians of philosophy”, residing at the 40th of floor my Parnassus Tower). “Story-tellers do exist in “philosophy” but who becomes a field marshal for writing a life of Julius Cesar?
       Take care ! never ask the definition of philosophy to a “philosopher”: he will feed you with the definition of his philosophy. It's comic, since the forst role  of philosophy is to define the bases, the tools of thought, therefore a true philosopher should star with the “definition of the definition”.  
       Spinoza smelled the need, (and the difficulty), 

“To make a hammer, a hammer is needed!”

          (already solved by Cro-Magnon with a pebble). Easy in the "hard world", not so In the "soft world". A rule therefore:

“the quality of a definition depends on the quality of the definition of his environment…”

          And until Kingdom comes, since any environment is inside another environment. The true Greek knew : “all is in all”. Philosophy becomes a “unending quest” and ae uneding improvement of my creativity. Kant had smelled it, (the next step for the searchers in the  Universities DREXEL and NORTHWESTERN). The accumulation of knowledge is useful and insufficient. Even Bergson had understood that the “philosopher” must be able to understand any knowledge.
           The GEMINI Method helps to choose a philosopher. Same way for our "preachers", often  proclaiming themselves “philosophers”, (justified since the first religion, (“satammism”), was the first "cosmology" and should have disappeared the true Greek appeared). Now the “philosophers” often offer their service to the "religious", (nowadays, even the "sociosophers" and the "psychosophers" do so). An opportunity  to evacuate all the “spriritualist philosophy ”, aquiquinade then cartesianism, (just re-furbished augustinade). With the last proposal, a funnyanalogy: Heid' Higler is Platon, Derry Dada provides the aristotology; and Lavinasse is Fatty Thomas. I distributed “Wittgenstein Prices”, (rewarding “hollow sentences filled with empty words”).  I was a little anxious at seeing our “tribal chiefs” praising the derrydadaïque phiLaureate…
        “Professionals philosophers”, like Bachelard orPopper, are perfectly balanced between philosophy, science and art). Personnaly, I recognize that a computer specialist is rather a “high-level technicien” than a scientific but, one century ago, it was the good choice.
       After working in 17 countries and four continents, at international level, in groups  with or without French speakers, I can compare. Napoleon called a knowledge a "discipline" and a diploma  a "rank".  So French consultants start by determning "the old fellow in the highest rank".  In fact, they just show their mental engraving and their incapacity to solve a problem.
       Therefore, how to explain the "France des Lumières"?  this small island of genius lost in a sterile sea of satisfaction. I find the explanation in the only French book deserving reading in the last century. At one moment, somebody reminds all that “Philosophy starts with a NO”. And France regularly produced such peoples: Alembert, Pasteur, Poincaré.  Marie Curie proves that France could welcome "people saying no", (like England revealing Popper and Wittgenstein): this discrete lady sent sent her daughter to pick her third Nobel…  Now, "froggisophers" used Bachelard for their own promotion  and taught the “langues romanes” in the USA, becoming these “philosophers that America envies us”;  ending "academifrançais".
3.3 Call to minds favoured for true philosophy
       If I show the final diagram of my “gestion integrée” to a student in science, at once he recognizes the famous Mendeiev matrix, surprising by its capacity of prediction.   There is much more in this diagram.  The scientist works in the Popperian "WORLD ONE" of ,  (place of the “complex”), while the manager operates in the "WORLD THREE", (full with “complications”.  It is thus interesting to find the same structures in two so different environments. (with a great difference:  a complicated problem should not be solved, but dissolved…)
      It seems that a young person “endowed for sciences” is protected from the French engraving  by a passion for knowledge.  Therefore he's favoured for true philosophy, (which, with my opinion, must be based on the method unconciously created by a great scientist, (Poincaré is my choice, so much in advance  on  Popper's choice, Einstein).  And my particular philo-teacher protects them, “No “philosophers” before thirty years. 
        In the enterprises, as a formation to  management thinking, I recommended  Laborit, Jacob, Monod… I wish them all the latter's enthusiasm  for  Popper's :“Logic of the Scientific Discovery” :  
              “One of the rare books in which a man of science  recognizes, and sometimes discovers, the movement of his thought, the true story, seldom written, of a progress to which it could contribute personally” (normal since Popper described the “method of Einstein”, perfectly described in Einstein's letters of 1920-1925). Attention, reading Popper is difficult because he had to battle all his life to impose his ideas. Many of his adversaries disappeared, better said : he made them disappear. Fortunately, he wrote a summary, 'Philosophy is an Unending Quest", (a model of courtesy towards readers, that I would impose on all the auto-proclaimed  “philosophers”).
        Maybe, the comment of Monod, (discovering in a true philosopher's book, he participated in a “progress”) describes the role of the true philosopher, (“to make what will not be made if it does not do it”. The scientist; (inevitably limited in a sector), realises a progress  recognized and confirmed by.his/her colleagues. But nobody can see, (not even Newton could),  the "type of thought"  created,  (sometimes more important than the "progress"). Therefore, the role of the philosopher would be to extend to all the fields of knowledge. Then each one solving a problem  brings a brick to "philosophy as an  “unending construction”…
.        Caution! From my contacts with the super-mathematicians, I deduce a risk. Kant thought it. Poincaré proves it: his arguments with Hadamard and C° are strictly due to different engravings. Poincaré created the maths he used.  Others were only “exploters”, (what noticed, monkeying Bachelard). Personnaly, I  practiced  statistics, (the language of life and of enterprises), enthusiastic to the point I wanted to engrave them unconsciously in my brain. Did I succeeded? In the world of the "mute" brain, checking is  difficult.
           The enterprise proves itself a terrible "stone of touch" for “philosophers”, (enterprise in a very broad sense, including "nation"). Not knowing who will be able to follow, I indicated those on whom I expect much.
          We admire the wonderful calculators juggling in numbers. . Such gifted brains do exist in the world of the ideas,  these thousands and thousands of small Einsteins that Nature produces with his trick “scoubidou”.. It is necessary to locate them as of the cradle and to protect them, (Temple Grandin thinks she  escaped because “No drug in her time”. I was luckier: “No 'Psys'  in mine”,  I was 16 years old when Kanner and Asperger appeared).  The big problem : they should  be protected from their parents. A hen can brood a duck, not teach it  how to swim and fly…  (Temple is the success as defined by her mother. My environment pointed to “Sky is the limit”).
To be continued….