July 31th/08 < "Type of Thought "after computer> keyed on ALTAVISTA 
placed 14 of my texts in the 16 FIRST ONES out off 24,300 “papers”


Call to  young people: “Fuck your fuckers!”

  L'aJustice
.Difficulties of any introduction
       When one presents oneself, one must present oneself? Since I present myself to present ideas, I will be sufficiently presented if my ideas presentable and are rather well presented… “ This logolaly to announce that I do not think like the “average man”, (I see).  To break the ice, I propose a play: let us  guess what we think reciprocally. A common point, anxiety, generalized today.  Me ?, (about to depart): “What could I bring to them?” You, (already in the process of garage ?) :  “Would he agree to enlist again in this three bridged-galera ?”  (“to start all over again”, said Ford). Sure, and twice:

1/ First reason to enlist again
     1.1 Why do I appear at 80 years ?
     1.2 “If one touches a hair of her…”
2/ My second reason to enlist again
     2.1 Half of this extraordinary change is missing...
3/ The enterprise gold mine of philosophy
     3.1 Aside on my “gold rules”
     3.2 Aside for the readers who interest me.
     3.3 Call to favoured for true philosophy.
4/Einstein avoided me the tactical error of Poincaré
     4.1 A true philosopher in the Medics of Enterprises
5/ Great Turning Points of History
  5.1 Appearance of the “general farmers ”
  5.2 Palestine given to his place…
   5.3 The true founder of Xristouille and Yidouille.

  5.4 Chosa and anti-CHOSA
6/ Distribution of remaining work
  6.1 My customers, of the million young people
  6.2 Different distribution for different philosophy
7/ Ends of the “justifications”
  7.1 A play of “Peter” Karchérito?
  7.2 Not answering call to the persons in charge…
  7.3 The possible prediction in the history?


1/ First reason to enlist again :
         I am as neutrally religious as the true Buddha, I even  consider me the reincarnation of
the “baron, the man that  thought me hundred years ago, (I also call it “Clemenceau”, as lucid as the Tiger was limited). In the difficult cases, I question him and he answers. There is a psychological explanation. The mystery of  creativity obsessed me all my life, (I continue Wittgenstein, that already affirmed : “philosophy is activity”). Creativity starts by silencing  the talkative brain. I found seven “ways” summarised by a slogan, “BREAK !”, (English has thi Word!), but the best is “the prayer to the baron”, (and recently, number eight appeared, thanks to the “toaster”).
       I suppose you read my biography, “My Incredible Crossing of the XXe century”, an amply justified title, (I can thus cease adding a comment to each paragraph). How to explain the efforts, time, money, used to discover me and the patience to train me ? What was the baron looking for ? a cold revenge ? Did he see that my “deficits” were a major assets ? For such a plan,  a brain had to escape all negative engravings, (aristotology, cartesianism, and hyper-widespread fayolism); able to realise the impossible marriage silicon-carbon. In fact, the way was opened : Boole and Babbage had shown the possible use of the computer. I think that Schopenhauer had smelled the bicameral system.  Now, the eternal question!
1.1 Why do I appear at 80 years?
        It is known  that any autist child  sticks to adults. But a “hautist” wants to dazzle those that dazzle him. No end with this play. When my “coaches” disappears, I looked for "betters" : I am a kind of harlequin made up of spare parts, bits of Newton, (as "absent-minded" as me),  Darwin, (I was the first to see he was “prosop”), Einstein and Wittgenstein, (whom I described as “voluntary late-talkers”);  as ambidextrous as Vinci. To imitate Comte, I was "isolated”, (because a little genius is not locked up). I do not think like others, I see, (the way of True Greeks and Vinci). Therefore, I do not appear at 80 years, I transmit both what  I realised and what I could not realise.
        As far as 1965, I could choose between multimillionaire and star-teacher in a "Great School". "Quo non ascenderam', in a normal environment? (a country of law). I would have achieved the dream of the scientists turning to and confiscating philosophy: to realise a total synthesis of knowledge. At this time, the
espaÑazi catho-curaille , (restored with the assistance of Hitler and Musso), made his second error, (the first was to choose the Saulian joKriss  as a Son for Zeusio). My daughter had adapted to my defichis”, leading to adoracion reciproca”. Not supporting her destruction, I used my trick: to insert me in an impossible problem, irresolute since millenia, over which thousands of diplômoculs broke their nose.
1.2 “If one touches a hair of her…”
        I complied with my threat, as a gentleman. Not to help the sovietism, I waited till the Fall of the Wall, and 22 years before bursting the "Xristouille".
Incredible  reaction from a sub-branch;  hysterical, infantile, suicidal.  "Yidouille" realized that it cannot exist without. To replace the aboriginals revolted in May 68, they had imported "indigenes" by the million. The "Xristouille"  was suppose to educate them... I for one, understand perfectly the rage of a totally immoral sect, having practically won, at metting a fellow smiling at them: "You should take me as your adviser... Years ago, I've been taught all you now invent laboriously". 
        All started with TV-threats from “Pal Lulu", with a "representative" environment, as they say. It was  the first  confirmation of the existence of  “private courts of justice". During my 22 years of false patience, I often wondered what  would be the answer of the "vaticanants". The
yidouille answer, totally infantile was foreseeable for who knows the genesis of the Western Religion. It obtained the inverse of his foal. Instead of “falsifying", destroying  my theories, it "fortified” them ). The Meg'Rabin Torquemada raised my case to the level of Rothchild and Mittereux Tricon.
        Welding of mandibs. Pontifecal rout. Lulu run to in Rome. Jerusalem intervenes. Lulu was brought back to Notre-Dame, given a TV station. I asked him to put order in his pigsty. Me, I saw the occasion to draw up a catalog of the yidouille arguments, very useful for the next generations.
          They invented the story-tale of the “three-religions”. Now, a fourth mousquetaire, the tibetan, is added. Another mystery: we have received a million bouddhis but I am the only one to think like the True Bouddha. As surprising as the sterility of million brains having with the quantity of schooling that produced Condorcet or of Alembert...

2/ My second reason to enlist again :
        My generation lived a total change, the third one in importance for 5000 years. The usual liturgy :  any progress is immediately taken over, confiscated by the “civisation ”); A long time after, appears the positive use, (“civilization”). The computer was a perfect demonstration of the incapacity of our “tribal chiefs” to understand our time, (most ognored this potential change,  “Grand Corniche”,  then “Mittereux Tricon”, “ChiGhasteropode”, etc… all  benefitting from the rule: “no election without an elect”.  .
2.1 Half of the third change still to come...
       I voted against Maij'Triche, proposing "bestiaux" instead of "euro", asking the type of false money the computer would permit. Easy starting from a very simple "pagode" :
It was enough to think of the use of the writing, of paper to predict the uses, (negative and positive), of the computer.  The bankers knew to create the plastic money and the roughneck soldiers to play with their remote-controlled bombs.  Today, general invitation to see and create the missing, easily deductible part...
Invention Civisation
Civilization
Writing
“software-slavism”
Greek/Chinese miracle
Paper
“currency of the pope”
liberalism calvinist
Rebirth-light
Arabic, English, French
Computer
Radio-controlled bombs,
 “highway moni”
“liberalism” monitheism
The “missing half
What must one
to wait here?

        As an exercise, add two complementary pagodas:  currencies, true and false. Typical : the first step for a “union”, it is a common language, ( ex-English teacher, fluent in all the official languages of  International Labour Organisation, I have a proposal). The masked founders of the CM, (“auto-divinised racists”), avoided the error of the “classical colonialists”.    Confirmed by linguistic Babel in Strasbourg and Brussels.
        What's important today, it is the "type of thought" imposed by the only appearance of the  computer, needing  “structures”,  “systems”, (needing to see the analogies”, to be  “piled up”, making “pagodas”, indefinitely, until the final synthesis.    I even  tend to judge people on their capacity to see/build “pagodas”.   
         How many noticed the incredible pagoda of 80, (EIGHTY) “pointed pointers” in OUTREAU?  My first pagoda? I think  it's the “Dreyfus”, three contradictory uses for the same “story-tale”… A model of auto-enculage and perfect introduction to the “language-cureton” which submerges us today.
       Two universities , with big machines, has just discovered/confirmed we have two manners of solving a problem. Anyone could guess it by understanding the mechanism of the bicameral system, ( I arrived at this conclusion by forcing my “dumb” brain, 60 years ago. Immediately, (imitating Zénon, leaving to Assouan to calculate the diameter of the ground with his stick), I undertook to program my mute brain. Better, having seen the “enterprises” like centers of creativity and “problem-solving”, I entered this place of problems and  decisions. I had to meet Wittgenstein, the creator of the “method of decisions”, (exactly “pre-decided decisions”).

3/  The enterprise as a gold mine to produce philosophers
        The students had smelled this track, when asking for “Profs with experience of the enterprise. Curious, the rare imprudent philosophers,  (including Simone Weil, Twiggy not Fatty), were ludicrous while the enterprise has a terrible need for true philosophy.
        Me, I started at the bottom. In the first time, I asked employees:
                “Why you do that,” - “that was tayght to us when we entered…”
        Having raised in rank and file, I asked the owner:
                “You know what they do?” - “Please do not change anything,  I would not know  what they do!”.
        Arrived at the top, (and invited in "business restaurants" ), I could ask Big Boss:
                “How you make your decisions?
        Answer? a proposal for a job, (my need to know pushed me to create my "integrated gestion". Is this the correct and only trail to manage a country ?)
       The enterprises cultivate the “Cartesian spirit”. The administrative fellow  pins a false parchment with the principles of René on the wall. The workman practices “system D”. All  stuffed of aristotology, of cartesianism; plus a speciality, the “fayolisation”.  This mental blocking existed well before Fayol and the Great Palaver of OUTREAU proved it but   did not solve this monstrosity; and it was not his goal…
      By the "Thirty Glorious Years”, management was reduced to simple rules, such  as “the customers do not cry and the banker does not threaten…” (this kind of manager was completely irremediable,as he dare not to admit his “tricks” to manage). By that time, the “philosophy of value” was in great fashion.. Therefore,  I have absorb all the forms of “industrial accoubnting”, the Americanstandard costs”  and Hitler's system to control his furnishers..
       In enterprises, as a true “hautist”, I started to create “rules”, (the hautists spend their time to this play…):
3.1 Aside on my “gold rules”.
        The most popular? “The solution is no more in the place of the problem…” with an appreciated cherry: “The managers would have found it… The most unexpected? my rule to detect a true philosopher, (which led me right to Wittgenstein, the difficult philosopher for an engraved brain):
The discovery of a true philosopher starts by discovering the discoveries which it already discovered…
           My “gestion integrée” is a replica to the “pre-decided decisions”, (I saw other common points, we were profs, he built a palace in Vienna, I built a factory in Central Africa…) By the same way, I also met Popper, a source of rules:
                “To uses has new technique, you must create a theory to uses it…”, (Just imagine the application to the computer in bussiness).
                  “A great discovery   prepares us to solve a greater problem... (I complete/rectify with: "and much more : you see ignored and dangerous problems, …” and especially:  “A great discovery requires the masked creation of a method more useful than this discovery…” (Example: the calculus of Newton  opened the industrial era, permitting the creation of machines-tools; the tools of his time were invented by the Pharaons).
        More Popper:  “The candidates philosophers should turn to the problems of the day and find a beginning of solution to them…” (quite my  philosophy-teacher prohibiting philosophers before thirty years of age…) And he shew what to demand of “philosophers”, (just  “redactionnists”): he summarized his life and his work in a small book: “Philosophy is an Unending Quest”, (I rectify/complete: “an Unending Construction”, therefore no Hegel will finish it and each one can contribute). 
        This rule  can be reversed
: “Any serious thinker  uses this logic, unconsciously”. See my deconstruction of a thinker, (secondary but not negligeable) like Bourdieu, (a Bachelard "in potentia", if he had met a true philosopher to guide it).  Like any  “candidate-philosopher” of his time, he was delivered to the “caimans” of the "Normal Sup"). Easy to sees him laboriously seeking, approaching, passing very close to this fundamental philosophy. Kif Levy-Strauss, who realized he thought in "structures" like the "Bourgeois Gentilhomme" spoke in prose! This greatly overrated Moïse-fellow should be celebrated as theintroducer” of Jakobson in France, ('Introducers-of" are quite current among consultants).  Thanks to all for proving that a universal logic exists.
           Many scientists provide this type of rules which I adore.  Bohr: “Your idea is eccentric but not enough to correspond to reality”. I compare with my  most insane psy-analysis: “Mind half logic, half illogical …” I rectified: “sometimes… sometimes… almost at will”. Then, immediate, offer of a mission in an atomic plant.
          “Rule”, (reglementation, regulation…), terms found in logic, morals, policy, (in  public and  private lives),  seems to indicate that intellectual and moral aspects go hand in hand. My philosophers confirm this rule, chiefly Wittgenstein or Newton. This last, an Anglican deacon,and "auto-called philosopher, was appointed the manager of the Mint, not by need of mathematically perfection in shillings but for a rare quality in his time, honesty. This  quality  made him hang 22 money-counterfeiters and he attended the ceremonies).  Caution! Bertalanffy warned us: “Who wants to be honest in a dishonest environment  will be destroyed…” (Finally Newton went back to Oxford for peace). 
          This chapter should lead to the reform of “philosophy”, (according to the Wittgenstanian rule: “In World Three,  don't solve, just dissolve problems”, terribly different.  The Ministry for Education  sent  philosophy-professors into factories?  (I could  be useful, as the first philosopher having reached the top-level and showing to young graduates how to hand a filthy stick…)
3.2 Aside for the readers that interest me…
       The “Kantian” adjective summarizes the intellectual and moral requirement. The philosophers whom I mentioned up to now are all “Kantian”, (nothing to see with “ayto-appointed-Kantian ministrosopher stuffed with  “Fichte-me-that”). The inKANTournable is invaluable for me. To play a good joke to the “philosophers”, let's make them elect the leader that will kick them all. Considering that scientists and philosophers use the same brain, I launch a GEMINI investigation all the “philosophers” give points to Kant, (who ignore them  and they finish in the box “histoirians of philosophy”, residing at the 40th of floor my Parnassus Tower). “Story-tellers do exist in “philosophy” but who becomes a field marshal for writing a life of Julius Cesar?
       Take care ! never ask the definition of philosophy to a “philosopher”: he will feed you with the definition of his philosophy. It's comic, since the forst role  of philosophy is to define the bases, the tools of thought, therefore a true philosopher should star with the “definition of the definition”.  
       Spinoza smelled the need, (and the difficulty), 
   “To make a hammer, a hammer is needed!”  
          (already solved by Cro-Magnon with a pebble). Easy in the "hard world", not so In the "soft world". A rule therefore:
   “the quality of a definition depends on the quality of the definition of his environment…”  
          And until Kingdom comes, since any environment is inside another environment. The true Greek knew : “all is in all”. Philosophy becomes a “unending quest” and ae uneding improvement of my creativity. Kant had smelled it, (the next step for the searchers in the  Universities DREXEL and NORTHWESTERN). The accumulation of knowledge is useful and insufficient. Even Bergson had understood that the “philosopher” must be able to understand any knowledge.
           The GEMINI Method helps to choose a philosopher. Same way for our "preachers", often  proclaiming themselves “philosophers”, (justified since the first religion, (“satammism”), was the first "cosmology" and should have disappeared the true Greek appeared). Now the “philosophers” often offer their service to the "religious", (nowadays, even the "sociosophers" and the "psychosophers" do so). An opportunity  to evacuate all the “spriritualist philosophy ”, aquiquinade then cartesianism, (just re-furbished augustinade). With the last proposal, a funnyanalogy: Heid' Higler is Platon, Derry Dada provides the aristotology; and Lavinasse is Fatty Thomas. I distributed Wittgenstein Prices, (rewarding “hollow sentences filled with empty words”).  I was a little anxious at seeing our “tribal chiefs” praising the derrydadaïque phiLaureate
        “Professionals philosophers”, like Bachelard orPopper, are perfectly balanced between philosophy, science and art). Personnaly, I recognize that a computer specialist is rather a “high-level technicien” than a scientific but, one century ago, it was the good choice.
       After working in 17 countries and four continents, at international level, in groups  with or without French speakers, I can compare. Napoleon called a knowledge a "discipline" and a diploma  a "rank".  So French consultants start by determning "the old fellow in the highest rank".  In fact, they just show their mental engraving and their incapacity to solve a problem.
       Therefore, how to explain the "France des Lumières"?  this small island of genius lost in a sterile sea of satisfaction. I find the explanation in the only French book deserving reading in the last century. At one moment, somebody reminds all that “Philosophy starts with a NO”. And France regularly produced such peoples: Alembert, Pasteur, Poincaré.  Marie Curie proves that France could welcome "people saying no", (like England revealing Popper and Wittgenstein): this discrete lady sent sent her daughter to pick her third Nobel…  Now, "froggisophers" used Bachelard for their own promotion 
and taught the “langues romanes” in the USA, becoming these “philosophers that America envies us”;  ending "academifrançais".
3.3 Call to minds favoured for true philosophy
       If I show the final diagram of my “gestion integrée” to a student in science,
at once he recognizes the famous Mendeiev matrix, surprising by its capacity of prediction.   There is much more in this diagram.  The scientist works in the Popperian "WORLD ONE" of ,  (place of the “complex”), while the manager operates in the "WORLD THREE", (full with “complications”.  It is thus interesting to find the same structures in two so different environments. (with a great difference:  a complicated problem should not be solved, but dissolved…)
      It seems that a young person “endowed for sciences” is protected from the French engraving  by a passion for knowledge.  Therefore he's favoured for true philosophy, (which, with my opinion, must be based on the method
unconciously created by a great scientist, (Poincaré is my choice, so much in advance  on  Popper's choice, Einstein).  And my particular philo-teacher protects them, “No “philosophers” before thirty years. 
        In the enterprises, as a formation to 
management thinking, I recommended  Laborit, Jacob, Monod… I wish them all the latter's enthusiasm  for  Popper's :Logic of the Scientific Discovery” :  
              “One of the rare books in which a man of science  recognizes, and sometimes discovers, the movement of his thought, the true story, seldom written, of a progress to which it could contribute personally” (normal since Popper described the “method of Einstein”, perfectly described in Einstein's letters of 1920-1925). Attention, reading Popper is difficult because he had to battle all his life to impose his ideas. Many of his adversaries disappeared, better said : he made them disappear. Fortunately, he wrote a summary, 'Philosophy is an Unending Quest", (a model of courtesy towards readers, that I would impose on all the auto-proclaimed  “philosophers”).
        Maybe, the comment of Monod, (discovering in a true philosopher's book, he participated in a “progress”) describes the role of the true philosopher, (“to make what will not be made if it does not do it”. The scientist; (inevitably limited in a sector), realises a progress  recognized and confirmed by.
his/her colleagues. But nobody can see, (not even Newton could),  the "type of thought"  created,  (sometimes more important than the "progress"). Therefore, the role of the philosopher would be to extend to all the fields of knowledge. Then each one solving a problem  brings a brick to "philosophy as an  “unending construction”…
.        Caution! From my contacts with the super-mathematicians, I deduce a risk. Kant thought it. Poincaré proves it: his arguments with Hadamard and C° are strictly due to different engravings. Poincaré created the maths he used.  Others were only “exploters”, (what noticed, monkeying Bachelard). Personnaly, I  practiced  statistics, (the language of life and of enterprises), enthusiastic to the point I wanted to engrave them unconsciously in my brain. Did I succeeded? In the world of the "mute" brain, checking is  difficult.
       
   The enterprise proves itself a terrible "stone of touch" for “philosophers”, (enterprise in a very broad sense, including "nation"). Not knowing who will be able to follow, I indicated those on whom I expect much.
          We admire the
wonderful calculators juggling in numbers. . Such gifted brains do exist in the world of the ideas,  these thousands and thousands of small Einsteins that Nature produces with his trick “scoubidou”.. It is necessary to locate them as of the cradle and to protect them, (Temple Grandin thinks she  escaped because “No drug in her time”. I was luckier: “No 'Psys'  in mine”,  I was 16 years old when Kanner and Asperger appeared).  The big problem : they should  be protected from their parents. A hen can brood a duck, not teach it  how to swim and fly…  (Temple is the success as defined by her mother. My environment pointed to “Sky is the limit”).
To be continued….

July 15th/08:  <"Type of Thought" after computer> keyed on ALTAVISTA 
placed 13 of my texts in the 15 FIRST ONES out of 23,400 "papers"


Appel aux jeunes: "Fuck your fuckers!"

L'aJustice
.La difficulté de toute introduction
       Quand on se présente, on se présente ? Puisque  je me présente pour présenter des idées, je serai suffisamment présenté si mes idées sont présentables et assez bien présentées..." Cette logolalie pour signaler que je ne pense pas comme le "Français moyen", (je vois).  Pour casser la glace, je propose un jeu : essayons de deviner ce que nous pensons réciproquement. Un point commun, l'inquiétude, généralisée aujourd'hui.  Moi ?, (en partance) : "Que puis-je leur  apporter?" Vous, (au démarrage ? déjà en voie de garage ?) :  "Accepterait-il de rempiler dans cette galère à trois ponts?"  ("to start all over again", disait Ford). Sûr, et deux fois :

1/ Premier motif de reprendre du service
     1.1 Pourquoi j'apparais à 80 ans ?
     1.2 "Si on lui touche un cheveu..."

2/ Mon  deuxième motif de reprendre du service
     2.1 Manque la moitié de cet extraordinaire  changement
3/ L'entreprise mine d'or de la philosophie
     3.1 Aparté sur mes "règles d'or"
     3.2 Aparté pour les lecteurs qui m'intéressent..
     3.3 Appel aux favorisés pour  la vraie philosophie.

4/  Einstein m'a évité l'erreur tactique de Poincaré

     4.1 Un vrai philosophe chez les
"médecins d'entreprise"
5/ Les grandes charnières de l'Histoire
 
5.1 Apparition des "fermiers généraux"
 
5.2  La Palestine remise à  sa place...
   5.3 Le vrai fondateur de la Xristouille et de la Yidouille.
  5.4 Chosa et anti-CHOSA

6/ Répartition du travail restant
  6.1 Ma clientèle, des millions de jeunes
  6.2 Répartition différente pour philosophie différente

7/ Fins des "justifications"
  7.1 Un jeu de "péter" Karchérito ?
  7.2 Appel aux responsables ne répondant pas...

 
7.3 La prédiction  possible dans l'histoire ?


1/ Premier motif de reprendre du service :
         Parce que je suis aussi neutre religieusement que le vrai Bouddha, au point de me considérer la réincarnation de celui qui m'a pensé il y a cent ans, le "baron", (je l'appelle aussi "Clemenceau", aussi lucide  que le "Tigre" fut borné). Dans les cas difficiles, je l'interroge et il me répond. Il y a une explication psychologique. Le mystère de la créativité m'obséda toute ma vie,  (j'allonge Wittgenstein, qui affirmait déjà: "la philosophie est activité"). La créativité commence par faire taire le cerveau bavard. J'ai trouvé cinq "méthodes"  résumées par un slogan, "BREAK!", (English has thi word !), la meilleure est "la prière au baron", (et récemment, une sixième est apparue, grâce au "grille-pain").
      
J'espère que vous avez lu ma biographie, "Mon Incroyable Traversée du XXe siècle »,  titre amplement justifié, (je peux donc cesser de mettre  un commentaire à chaque paragraphe). Comment expliquer les efforts, temps, argent, pour me découvrir et la  patience pour me "dresser". Le baron  cherchait une vengeance froide ? A-t-il vu que mes "déficits" étaient des atouts majeurs ? Pour son plan, il fallait un cerveau ayant échappé aux dressages négatifs, (l'aristotologie, le cartésiânisme,et le fayolisme déjà hyper-répandu) capable de repérer, confisquer la synthèse gagnante, l'impossible mariage silicium-carbone. Boole et  Babbage avaient montré l'utilisation possible de l'ordinateur. Je pense que Schopenhauer avait flairé le bicaméralisme.  Maintenant, l'éternelle question !
1.1 Pourquoi j'apparais à 80 ans ?
        Comprendre qu'un autiste se colle aux adultes. Mais un  "hautiste" veut éblouir ceux qui l'éblouissent. Pas de fin à ce jeu. Lorsque mes "coaches" disparaissent, je me colle sur mes semblables, sans peine : je suis une sorte d'arlequin  composé de pièces détachées, prises à Newton, (plus distrait que moi), à Darwin, (je fus le premier à le signaler comme "prosop"), à Einstein et Wittgenstein, (que j'ai qualifiés de "voluntary late-talkers");  aussi ambidextre que Vinci. Pour flirter avec Comte, je fus "isolé", (parce qu'un petit génie ne s'enferme pas).
Je ne pense pas comme tous, je "vois", (la manière  des vrais Grecs et de Vinci). Je n'apparais pas à 80 ans, je cesse de tenter Dieu, comme disent les "croyants", (surtout le type athée-laïcon).
       
Dès 1965, je pouvais choisir entre multimillionnaire et prof-vedette dans Grande Ecole. Que serais-je devenu dans un environnement normal ? (un pays de droit). Aurais-je accompli le rêve des savants devenus philosophes : faire une synthèse totale des connaissances, semblable à leur synthèse scientifique. A ce moment, la catho-curaille espaÑazie, (rétablie avec l'aide d'Hitler et Musso), commit sa seconde erreur, (la première fut de choisir le joKriss saulien comme fils du Zeusio). Ma fille s'était adaptée à mes "déficits", une "adoracion reciproca". Moi, j'ai la résistance légendaire des autistes. Ne supportant  pas sa destruction, j'ai utilisé mon truc : m'enfoncer dans un problème impossible, irrésolu depuis des millénaires, sur lequel des milliers de diplômoculs se sont cassés le nez. Une manière d'oublier ? fausse patience...
1.2
"Si on lui touche un cheveu..."
        J'ai tenu ma menace, en gentleman. Pour ne pas aider le soviétisme, j'ai attendu la Chute du Mur, et 22 ans avant de "péter" la Xristouille. Irréversiblement. Réaction incroyable, hystérique, infantile, suicidaire.  La Yidouille se rend compte qu'elle ne peut exister sans. Ils  importaient de l'indigène pour remplacer les aborigènes révoltés en mai 68. Qui allait assurer le "dressage" ? 
       
Télé-menaces de "Pote Lulu".  Il confirme qu'on installe des tribunaux  "privés". Pendant les 22 ans de patience mal acceptée, je me suis souvent demandé quelle serait la réponse "xristouille". La réponse "yidouille", aussi nulle qu'inf