UNAMUNO vous assure : "Ils vaincront ? peut-être, parce que les plus fourbes ! Ils ne convaincront jamais !. . . .

In enterprises, as a true “hautist”, I started to create “rules”, (the hautists spend their time to this play…):

3.1 Aside on my “gold rules”.
The most popular? “The solution is no more in the place of the problem…” with an appreciated cherry: “The managers would have found it… The most unexpected? my rule to detect a true philosopher, (which led me right to Wittgenstein, the difficult philosopher for an engraved brain):

“The discovery of a true philosopher starts by discovering the discoveries which it already discovered…”

My “gestion integrée” is a replica to the “pre-decided decisions”, (I saw other common points, we were profs, he built a palace in Vienna, I built a factory in Central Africa…) By the same way, I also met Popper, a source of rules:

“To uses has new technique, you must create a theory to uses it…”, (Just imagine the application to the computer in bussiness).

                  “A great discovery   prepares us to solve a greater problem... (I complete/rectify with: "and much more : you see ignored and dangerous problems, …” and especially: “A great discovery requires the masked creation of a method more useful than this discovery…” (Example: the calculus of Newton opened the industrial era, permitting the creation of machines-tools; the tools of his time were invented by the Pharaons).
        More Popper: “The candidates philosophers should turn to the problems of the day and find a beginning of solution to them…” (quite my philosophy-teacher prohibiting “philosophers” before thirty years of age…) And he shew what to demand of “philosophers”, (just “redactionnists”): he summarized his life and his work in a small book: “Philosophy is an Unending Quest”, (I rectify/complete: “an Unending Construction”, therefore no Hegel will finish it and each one can contribute).
        This rule can be reversed: “Any serious thinker uses this logic, unconsciously”. See my deconstruction of a thinker, (secondary but not negligeable) like Bourdieu, (a Bachelard "in potentia", if he had met a true philosopher to guide it). Like any “candidate-philosopher” of his time, he was delivered to the “caimans” of the "Normal Sup"). Easy to sees him laboriously seeking, approaching, passing very close to this fundamental philosophy. Kif Levy-Strauss, who realized he thought in "structures" like the "Bourgeois Gentilhomme" spoke in prose! This greatly overrated Moïse-fellow should be celebrated as the “introducer” of Jakobson in France, ('Introducers-of" are quite current among consultants). Thanks to all for proving that a universal logic exists.
           Many scientists provide this type of rules which I adore. Bohr: “Your idea is eccentric but not enough to correspond to reality”. I compare with my most insane psy-analysis: “Mind half logic, half illogical …” I rectified: “sometimes… sometimes… almost at will”. Then, immediate, offer of a mission in an atomic plant.
          “Rule”, (reglementation, regulation…), terms found in logic, morals, policy, (in public and private lives), seems to indicate that intellectual and moral aspects go hand in hand. My philosophers confirm this rule, chiefly Wittgenstein or Newton. This last, an Anglican deacon,and "auto-called philosopher” , was appointed the manager of the Mint, not by need of mathematically perfection in shillings but for a rare quality in his time, honesty. This quality made him hang 22 money-counterfeiters and he attended the ceremonies). Caution! Bertalanffy warned us: “Who wants to be honest in a dishonest environment will be destroyed…” (Finally Newton went back to Oxford for peace).
          This chapter should lead to the reform of “philosophy”, (according to the Wittgenstanian rule: “In World Three, don't solve, just dissolve problems”, terribly different. The Ministry for Education sent philosophy-professors into factories? (I could be useful, as the first philosopher having reached the top-level and showing to young graduates how to hand a filthy stick…)

3.2 Aside for the readers that interest me…
       The “Kantian” adjective summarizes the intellectual and moral requirement. The philosophers whom I mentioned up to now are all “Kantian”, (nothing to see with “ayto-appointed-Kantian ministrosopher stuffed with “Fichte-me-that”). The inKANTournable is invaluable for me. To play a good joke to the “philosophers”, let's make them elect the leader that will kick them all. Considering that scientists and philosophers use the same brain, I launch a GEMINI investigation : all the “philosophers” give points to Kant, (who ignore them and they finish in the box “histoirians of philosophy”, residing at the 40th of floor my Parnassus Tower). “Story-tellers do exist in “philosophy” but who becomes a field marshal for writing a life of Julius Cesar?
       Take care ! never ask the definition of philosophy to a “philosopher”: he will feed you with the definition of his philosophy. It's comic, since the forst role of philosophy is to define the bases, the tools of thought, therefore a true philosopher should star with the “definition of the definition”.
       Spinoza smelled the need, (and the difficulty),

“To make a hammer, a hammer is needed!”

(already solved by Cro-Magnon with a pebble). Easy in the "hard world", not so In the "soft world". A rule therefore:

“the quality of a definition depends on the quality of the definition of his environment…”

        And until Kingdom comes, since any environment is inside another environment. The true Greek knew : “all is in all”. Philosophy becomes a “unending quest” and ae uneding improvement of my creativity. Kant had smelled it, (the next step for the searchers in the Universities DREXEL and NORTHWESTERN). The accumulation of knowledge is useful and insufficient. Even Bergson had understood that the “philosopher” must be able to understand any knowledge.
       The GEMINI Method helps to choose a philosopher. Same way for our "preachers", often proclaiming themselves “philosophers”, (justified since the first religion, (“satammism”), was the first "cosmology" and should have disappeared the true Greek appeared). Now the “philosophers” often offer their service to the "religious", (nowadays, even the "sociosophers" and the "psychosophers" do so). An opportunity to evacuate all the “spriritualist philosophy ”, aquiquinade then cartesianism, (just re-furbished augustinade). With the last proposal, a funnyanalogy: Heid' Higler is Platon, Derry Dada provides the aristotology; and Lavinasse is Fatty Thomas. I distributed “Wittgenstein Prices”, (rewarding “hollow sentences filled with empty words”). I was a little anxious at seeing our “tribal chiefs” praising the derrydadaïque phiLaureate…
        “Professionals philosophers”, like Bachelard orPopper, are perfectly balanced between philosophy, science and art). Personnaly, I recognize that a computer specialist is rather a “high-level technicien” than a scientific but, one century ago, it was the good choice.
       After working in 17 countries and four continents, at international level, in groups with or without French speakers, I can compare. Napoleon called a knowledge a "discipline" and a diploma a "rank". So French consultants start by determning "the old fellow in the highest rank". In fact, they just show their mental engraving and their incapacity to solve a problem.
       Therefore, how to explain the "France des Lumières"? this small island of genius lost in a sterile sea of satisfaction. I find the explanation in the only French book deserving reading in the last century. At one moment, somebody reminds all that “Philosophy starts with a NO”. And France regularly produced such peoples: Alembert, Pasteur, Poincaré. Marie Curie proves that France could welcome "people saying no", (like England revealing Popper and Wittgenstein): this discrete lady sent sent her daughter to pick her third Nobel… Now, "froggisophers" used Bachelard for their own promotion and taught the “langues romanes” in the USA, becoming these “philosophers that America envies us”; ending "academifrançais".
3.3 Call to minds favoured for true philosophy
       If I show the final diagram of my “gestion integrée” to a student in science, at once he recognizes the famous Mendeiev matrix, surprising by its capacity of prediction. There is much more in this diagram. The scientist works in the Popperian "WORLD ONE" of , (place of the “complex”), while the manager operates in the "WORLD THREE", (full with “complications”. It is thus interesting to find the same structures in two so different environments. (with a great difference: a complicated problem should not be solved, but dissolved…)
    It seems that a young person “endowed for sciences” is protected from the French engraving by a passion for knowledge. Therefore he's favoured for true philosophy, (which, with my opinion, must be based on the method unconciously created by a great scientist, (Poincaré is my choice, so much in advance on Popper's choice, Einstein). And my particular philo-teacher protects them, “No “philosophers” before thirty years.
        In the enterprises, as a formation to management thinking, I recommended Laborit, Jacob, Monod… I wish them all the latter's enthusiasm for Popper's :“Logic of the Scientific Discovery” :
              “One of the rare books in which a man of science recognizes, and sometimes discovers, the movement of his thought, the true story, seldom written, of a progress to which it could contribute personally” (normal since Popper described the “method of Einstein”, perfectly described in Einstein's letters of 1920-1925). Attention, reading Popper is difficult because he had to battle all his life to impose his ideas. Many of his adversaries disappeared, better said : he made them disappear. Fortunately, he wrote a summary, 'Philosophy is an Unending Quest", (a model of courtesy towards readers, that I would impose on all the auto-proclaimed “philosophers”).
        Maybe, the comment of Monod, (discovering in a true philosopher's book, he participated in a “progress”) describes the role of the true philosopher, (“to make what will not be made if it does not do it”. The scientist; (inevitably limited in a sector), realises a progress recognized and confirmed by.his/her colleagues. But nobody can see, (not even Newton could), the "type of thought" created, (sometimes more important than the "progress"). Therefore, the role of the philosopher would be to extend to all the fields of knowledge. Then each one solving a problem brings a brick to "philosophy as an “unending construction”…
.     Caution! From my contacts with the super-mathematicians, I deduce a risk. Kant thought it. Poincaré proves it: his arguments with Hadamard and C° are strictly due to different engravings. Poincaré created the maths he used. Others were only “exploters”, (what noticed, monkeying Bachelard). Personnaly, I practiced statistics, (the language of life and of enterprises), enthusiastic to the point I wanted to engrave them unconsciously in my brain. Did I succeeded? In the world of the "mute" brain, checking is difficult.
           The enterprise proves itself a terrible "stone of touch" for “philosophers”, (enterprise in a very broad sense, including "nation"). Not knowing who will be able to follow, I indicated those on whom I expect much.
        We admire the wonderful calculators juggling in numbers. . Such gifted brains do exist in the world of the ideas, these thousands and thousands of small Einsteins that Nature produces with his trick “scoubidou”.. It is necessary to locate them as of the cradle and to protect them, (Temple Grandin thinks she escaped because “No drug in her time”. I was luckier: “No 'Psys' in mine”, I was 16 years old when Kanner and Asperger appeared). The big problem : they should be protected from their parents. A hen can brood a duck, not teach it how to swim and fly… (Temple is the success as defined by her mother. My environment pointed to “Sky is the limit”).
To be continued….

"La découverte d'un vrai philosophe commence par découvrir les découvertes qu'il a déjà découvertes..."

Ma "gestion intégrée" complétait les "décisions pré-décidées", (j'aperçus d'autres points communs, nous fûmes profs, il a bâti un palais à Vienne, j'ai bâti une usine en Centre-Afrique...) En chemin, j'ai également rencontré Popper, une source de règles :

"To use a new technique, you must create a theory to use it...", (imaginer l'application à l'informatique de gestion).

                  "Une grande découverte fait plus que préparer à une découverte plus grande, (je complète); elle fait voir des problèmes ignorés, dangereux..." et surtout : "Une grande découverte exige la création d'une méthode qui apporte plus que la découverte..." (Exemple: le calculus de Newton qui ouvre l'ère industrielle, les outils de son époque furent inventés chez les pharaons).
        Encore Popper : "Les candidats philosophes feraient mieux de s'intéresser aux problèmes du jour et de leur trouver un début de solution..." (je retrouve mon philo-prof m'interdisant tout "philosophe" avant trente ans...) Et il a donné l'exemple de ce qu'il faut exiger des "philosophes", (juste des "rédactionnistes", plus féconds qu'Alexandre Dumas): il résuma sa vie et ses travaux dans un petit livre: "Philosophy is an unending quest", (je complète: "an unending construction", donc personne ne la terminera et chacun peut contribuer). Cette règle, exigeante, pour découvrir les vrais philosophes, peut s'inverser,: "Tout penseur sérieux va utiliser cette même logique, inconsciemment".
        D'où mon étude-descente en flammes sur un penseur, (secondaire mais pas nul) comme Bourdieu, (un Bachelard en puissance, s'il avait eu la chance de rencontrer un vrai philosophe pour le guider). Comme les "candides-philosophes" de son époque, il fut livré aux "caïmans" de l'aNormal Sup.) De fait, on le voit chercher, approcher, frôler, cette philosophie fondamentale, laborieusement, (kif Levy-Strauss, (le surfait "pro Moïsi amor"), qui s'aperçoit qu'il pensait structure comme le Bourgeois parlait en prose! Moi, je le vois comme "introducteur" de Jakobson). Tous prouvent qu'une logique universelle existe.
           Beaucoup de savants fournissent ces règles que j'adore. Bohr: "Ton idée est farfelue mais pas assez pour correspondre à la réalité". Je rapproche de ma plus folle psy-analyse : "Esprit moitié logique, moitié illogique..." Je rectifiai: "tantôt... tantôt... presqu'à volonté". Curieuse porte d'entrée pour une mission dans une Centrale atomique.
          "Règle", (règlement, réglementation...), terme trouvé en logique, morale, politique, dans le public et le privé semblent indiquer qu'intellectuel et moral vont de pair. Mes philosophes confirment, aussi bien Wittgenstein ou Newton. Ce dernier, "philosopher" et diacre anglican, fut directeur de la Monnaie, non par besoin de shillings mathématiquement parfaits mais pour une qualité rare en son époque, l'honnêteté, (il fit d'ailleurs pendre 22 faux-monnayeurs et assista à la cérémonie). Attention ! Bertalanffy a prévenu: "Qui veut être honnête dans un environnement malhonnête, sera détruit..." Serait-ce la cause de leur petit nombre ? Tenons-nous une piste juteuse pour construire l'avenir.
          Chapitre décousu ? volontairement. Il contient la réforme de l'enseignement de la "philosophie", (selon règle : "dans le World Three, on ne résout pas, on dissout", sacrément différent. Le Ministère du Dressage essaya d'envoyer des philo-profs en usine, (j'aurais pu être utile ayant atteint le top-niveau et pilotant de jeunes diplômés, dont les profs ne savaient jongler avec un bâton merdeux...)